At CAANZ members can call an EGM with 200 signatories. We could not call one cause we needed 5% = 6,000. Also their version of the Representative Council does a lot more and can remove a Director. Their CEO got paid about the same as our 2 COOs. So whilst they may also have hidden problems it is very different.JWheldon wrote: ↑Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:17 pmYou may think that going to ICAANZ will mean a positive change, but ICAANZ has its own hidden problems. The current accounting system, the current check and balances to the membership, and the current audit system is no different at ICAANZ. They just do a better job, in the hiding the skelton's.
|Merry Christmas to Peter Wilson. When it was suggested that Peter Wilson should be independent of the old board so that we can have a fresh start Peter responded with "That's your issue". Summary of the meeting here: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=594|
A good summary of where we are up to by Joe Aston of the AFR, linked to from here: viewtopic.php?f=5&p=4137#p4137
If you are new to this website read the story so far: viewtopic.php?t=321#p1793
Check out some of the AFR articles, too many to list and check out some of the ABC reports: http://www.afr.com/business/accounting/ ... 215-h055ej http://www.afr.com/business/accounting/ ... 211-h02x1d http://www.abc.net.au/news/programs/the ... s,/8626662
Please join this website to participate in discussions. Also join our email list at http://eepurl.com/cWsgfb
A weekly round up of the issues and progress
The Naked Webmaster