Merry Christmas to Peter Wilson. When it was suggested that Peter Wilson should be independent of the old board so that we can have a fresh start Peter responded with "That's your issue". Summary of the meeting here: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=594
A good summary of where we are up to by Joe Aston of the AFR, linked to from here: viewtopic.php?f=5&p=4137#p4137
If you are new to this website read the story so far: viewtopic.php?t=321#p1793
Check out some of the AFR articles, too many to list and check out some of the ABC reports: http://www.afr.com/business/accounting/ ... 215-h055ej http://www.afr.com/business/accounting/ ... 211-h02x1d http://www.abc.net.au/news/programs/the ... s,/8626662
Please join this website to participate in discussions. Also join our email list at http://eepurl.com/cWsgfb
Image

Email from CPA Australia re AFR Article 9th June

Post Reply
User avatar
GenYCPA
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:19 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Email from CPA Australia re AFR Article 9th June

Post by GenYCPA » Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:41 pm

For those people who are not on the Public Practice mailing list, here is a copy of the e-mail we were sent this morning.
CPA Email 9 June 2017.PNG
CPA Email 9 June 2017.PNG (111.01 KiB) Viewed 569 times
I have attached my response and encourage others to respond (copied into their divisional president and chair of their divisional public practice committee).
Response to CPA email 09 June 2017.pdf
(273.64 KiB) Downloaded 96 times
Robert McDowall CPA | Partner | Arabon Accountants

https://www.linkedin.com/in/robert-mcdowall/
Join the conversation on the CPA Members Group on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/groups/103561

User avatar
nakedadmin
Site Admin
Posts: 583
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Iceland

Re: Email from CPA Australia re AFR Article 9th June

Post by nakedadmin » Fri Jun 09, 2017 4:36 pm

That letter is brilliant. I liked this bit the best:
Furthermore, the Professional Standards Councils states that a key advantage of operating under a Professional Standards Scheme is that it distinguishes our association and our members as a recognised profession. This goes far beyond the cost of our PI insurance premiums and exposure to significant liability we practising members may face. This goes to the heart of our reputation as a professional association in what is an increasingly competitive market. "it's increasingly difficult for consumers, governments and even aspiring professionals to be able to tell the genuinely professional from the growing field of people claiming to be professional".
The Naked Webmaster

Post Reply